Saturday, March 21, 2015

JANUARY 6, 2015 1:53PM

Meet the Mormon!

Rate: 10 Flag
  missi

MISSIONARY


Released: October 2013?
Director:  Anthony DiBlasi
Writers:  Bruce Wood, Scott Poiley
Notable Cast:  Dawn Olivieri, Mitch Ryan, Kip Pardue
Plot:  Katherine is a struggling mother trying to create a better life for her and her son. She meets Elder Brock, a handsome Mormon missionary with a troubled past and they begin an incendiary love affair. But when Katherine reunites with her estranged husband, Elder Brock can't accept that things are over - and he will stop at nothing to prove to her that they are meant to be together forever! - Source: imdb user Bruce Wood
Commentary: I watched this one with a group of ex - some just lapsed - Mormon friends, most of them members of the LGBT community. And I will admit, this was done in the spirit of wrong fun.  They were highly amused.  By all accounts the film recreated the missionary experience accurately, sans the love affair/obsessive violence, of course.
Missionary has a bit of a split personality problem. 
It has a precious indie feel about it, complete with shimmering indie soundtrack, tasteful eroticism (cheesecake mostly focused on the hunky Elder Brock played by Mitch Ryan) and softly lit, introspective scenes. 
Katherine, the mom drawn into the affair, has some quiet scenes reminiscent of the transgressive joy felt by Diane Lane's character in Unfaithful, although she is separated from her husband and doesn't have that burden of guilt. 
So for a long while you may think this film is all about Katherine eating, praying, loving and getting her groove back.  You go girl!
But then Katherine's husband (Kip Pardue) returns to reconcile with his family, Elder Brock snaps, and it all descends into Lifetime Television for Women/Fatal Attraction land, and beyond.  
The violent stalking is capped off by an amazing gratuitously gruesome horror movie scene.  I loved it!
We don't really come to understand much about Elder Brock and why he's so broken.  Tragic past, relationship violence, rigid religious outlook (while breaking many of its rules) - in the end, Elder Brock is just your stock Lifetime villain obsessed lover.   But hey, we've never seen a Mormon missionary in that role before!
Of note is the way the film touched upon the issue of race in the LDS Church.  A scene where Katherine is speaking to a black male acquaintance causes Elder Brock some rage.  "What's up with Mr. Mark of Cain?" he asks her, before deciding to beat him to a pulp later on.
Race is an uncomfortable topic in Mormon doctrine, and it goes beyond not allowing black males to hold the priesthood, a ban lifted as recently as 1978.  You can read more from these sources.  The thing to remember is that in some ways, Mormonism is highly and rapidly adaptable when it wants/needs to be (polygamy reform, for example).  Black membership in the Mormon Church is apparently on the rise.
Regardless: in the end, Missionary is entertaining, well acted and psychotronic enough to be worth it, even if where it all goes is no surprise.



Also check out: "The Case of the Manacled Mormon"- a similar premise in reverse, in the UK, and it's all true!  Watch the documentary Tabloid, about Joyce McKinney, a former beauty queen who kept her young Mormon missionary obsession chained to her bed ...
 
Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!

Comments

This is an interesting article. Not much into stalker violence, so i'll pass. But thanks for the warning!
R
Understood PW, but thank you for reading!
I'd never heard of this film, so thank you for the information about it. I'm wondering if this film is an example of the term often used to pitch a film or TV show: High Concept.
Thanks Jerry - it is possible! The film didn't get much distribution but has made the indie circuit.
BTW, nice comment at my place! TY!
Sounds like a bit of a hoot. (Will wait for it to show up on TV)
R&R ;-) "Kinky Sex" with Missionaries in bondage... way to start the New Year!
Interesting movie. Thanks for the review. My young black friend joined the Mormon Church. Odd. He wanted some respectability and they tried to help him. They seem to have lots of money for food banks and employment services etc. Under all religions there seems to be sexual tensions. hmm....
Where DO you find this stuff????? No kidding, you totally amaze me Chiller. Wow.
Perhaps Katherine just got bored with the Missionary position (ba-dum!).
@Various:
ba-da-bing!
OCTOBER 31, 2014 4:43PM

Rosemary's Remake - Happy Halloween!

Rate: 7 Flag


RBa
ROSEMARY'S BABY

Released: 2014
Director:  Agnieszka Holland
Writers:  Scott Abbot, James Wong, based on the novel by Ira Levin
Notable Cast:  Zoe Saldana, Patrick J. Adams, Carole Bouquet, Jason Isaacs, Stefano Cassetti
Plot:  Modern 4 hour mini-series adaptation of the classic novel by Ira Levin focusing on young Rosemary Woodhouse's suspicions that her neighbors may belong to a Satanic cult who are hell bent on getting one thing: the baby she is carrying. (source: imdb)
Commentary: Broken record time: I find 1968's Rosemary's Baby to be one of the best horror thrillers in existence.  I would not be easily pleased by any remake at all.
But I'm actually okay with this 2014 reimagining, even though I can safely point to why Polanski's version is superior.
Of course, not everyone agrees with me.  Let's listen to the sage words of brilliant cinema critic 'Modernhorrorrox' of the imdb message boards, who claims is it not as "boreing" as the original:
rb1 
 Who knows, maybe he's right?  I first saw the original in 1984 or so, and I was riveted for the whole 2+hours.  Never once did I want any of the scenes - the shopping, the haircut, the party, Guy and Rosemary's relationship moments -  to hurry up or be cut from the film as the mystery and horror unfolded.  The build up was just too good.  But maybe I was just a weird kid?
Anyways, here's why RB 2014 is different enough from the source material, making it both worthwhile and not its own masterpiece:
The Paris setting - the original is a quintessential New York City movie.  So if your goal is to make your remake distinct and unique, this was a good decision.  I doubt this will become a quintessential Paris movie, but it is a successful bid to add some sexy European sophistication to the story.  More on that later.
Rosemary and Guy - I haven't cared much for Zoe Saldana's acting, but she did great here.  From what I've read, Saldana insisted on changing the naive, childish waifishness that Mia Farrow brought to the role - as well she should for a film set in 2014.  She also insisted she "doesn't like old guys", hence a younger Guy (hah! see what I did there).  Hey, don't complain, women are always on the receiving end of that in Hollywood.
That said - Guy Woodhouse?  A struggling writer instead of struggling actor.  Played by Patrick J. Adams, he was just a leaden sad-sack hipster that I disliked from the get-go.  John Cassavettes was charming, talented, funny, weasilish, attractive and actually made you like the character until well into the middle of the film.
Mon Dieu! Tres sexy! - I'm about to commit a serious  heinous traitorous  blasphemy.  I am an enormous fan of Minnie and Roman Castevet in the original.  Sidney Blackmer was so confident and menacing as Roman/Steven Marcato, and you can't tell me Ruth Gordon as Minnie ins't the hottest Scream Queen cougar ever!
  RBb

But then, this remake presented us with Roman and 'Margaux' Castevet.  And they're too elegant and beautiful not to fall for their satanic seductions. 
RBc 
Gorgeous former Bond Girl Carole Bouquet as Margaux Castevet is a timeless and classically beautiful woman.  Roman, as played by Jason Isaacs, was debonaire and suave. 
There was a very sexual atmosphere to this miniseries, with Rosemary's haunting dreams and visions of the "Man With Blue Eyes" and his orgies.  Even the ceremonial pregnancy was kinda hot.  
The Castevets were all over the Woodhouses in suggestive and inappropriate ways, implying some kind of swinging.  Embarassingly, I have to admit I would've swung with them.
RBd 



MODERN HORROR ROX LOL! - let's now consult again with the distinguished cinema critic 'Modernhorrorrox' of the imdb message boards on why the 1968 version of Rosemary's Baby doesn't quite meet the standards of greatness:
rb3
rb4 
Where would we be without his keen insight into the art of filmmaking?
RB 2014's director, Agnieszka Holland is very impressive.  Just take a look at her imdb page.  Europa, Europa and Blue (her part of the Three Colors trilogy of films) were terrific.
That's why I'm surprised she wasn't able to craft a mystery and a thriller in her own way that at least approaches what Polanski did. 
Look, we're taken out of Rosemary's POV several times, right down to seeing Guy openly conspiring with the Castevets and seeing Margaux cast some kind of spell in order to get rid of the Hutch analogue, Rosemary's friend played by Cristina Cole. 
For pity's sake, in 1968 the seduction of Guy Woodhouse was left for you to imagine between Roman's "why don't you join me for a drink in the study?" and the curl of cigar smoke when Rosemary returns to their presence.  Here, we have Roman take Guy out to a douchey Parisian Hellfire Club and throw a whole bunch of T&A and dreams of famous writerhood his way.  You can't tell me that the latter is a better artistic choice.
To build any kind of sense of isolation, paranoia and fear, especially around a pregnant woman who may or may not be going insane, that's just not the way to do it.
Suggest it, imply it, but don't show it.
Remember the amazing tidbits and mysteries around the Black Bramford (the Upper West Side's Dakota building) that we were recounted in the original film?  Pearl Ames.  The Trench sisters.  Keith Kennedy. The death of Terry.  These were told, not shown.  We had to fill in the blanks ourselves and I don't know about you but my imagination ran wild, and there are STILL long and heated discussions about whether or not Terry killed herself and how.
Well, in 2014 we actually get to see a scene of the Trench Sisters killing a guy in order to gobble him up for dinner.  And we even open with a scene of the Terry analogue in the film jumping out of the window.  She's given a husband who stalks Guy and Rosemary and is nuts and WARNS THEM! WARNS THEM! Until of course, The Castevets twitch their nose and he's done for.
To modernhorrorrox's delight, we get some gore and running blood and slow-mo "coincidence-fu" scenes of mayhem.  Was Holland trying again to make her remake distinct? 
I have  to think that this was mandated by higher ups trying to reach the Modernhorrorrox's of today.  
What We're Afraid Of:  There is of course that boogeyman that runs throughout my blog series this year: economic anxiety.  The story of Rosemary's Baby in any incarnation, novel or film, is the story of a Faustian bargain for material gain, and one that the bargainer might have to pay for, but we won't see the consequences to him. 
The great beast greed will lead your conscience to whore your own spouse out to the devil.
But 2014 also had an interesting theme: reproductive rights.  This Rosemary, and her poor doomed friend, fought for hers very strongly against decisions that men were trying to make for her.  This is a good new spin on the material.

Happy Halloween to my readers! Thanks for joining me these 31 Days.


 Chillerpop takes all questions and comments via Twitter (@Chillerpop) or via Facebook
Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!

Comments

You know Rosemary's Baby was far fetched... the remake-- but I still liked it. LOL

HAPPY HALLOWEEN
Anything with Ruth Gordon in it is an instant classic. I am very leery of sequels, especially when the original is well done. Nevertheless, Hollywood is obsessed with sequels because most "suits" are afraid to take chances on new ideas, and the hollywood execs know they can bank a certain number on a sequel.

RATED
R&R for a job well done. ;-)
This should be fun to see. Thanks!
I liked your analysis of why the original, a true classic in my opinion, was superior, especially the point about suggesting instead of showing.
Interesting spin. Thanks for this post!
You are bang on about the original "Rosemary's Baby": a true classic (can I also throw in how much I love the film's haunting theme music with a trilling-Mia Farrow). So I wanted to read what you had to say about this remake as my feelings were like yours: I'm not sure I wanted to watch the remake as the original is so perfect all on its own. So your comparative approach to the two was interesting, especially since you found some aspects to like about it.

Ever see the TV movie sequel from circa 1977: "Whatever Happened To Rosemary's Baby"? It seemed fairly ridiculous to my mid-teens self but I'm sure now it could very well be a full-on howling-with-laughter Fest.

Thanks for producing this 31-day series of entries, Chiller. Really enjoyed them and appreciate all the time and work that goes into them.
Thanks jmac, Abrawang, algis, zanelle, and VA.
VA, I have seen parts of "Look What's Happened..." awful. How about that satanic mime dance? Heh!
Testing testing 1 2 3!
OCTOBER 30, 2014 4:15PM

Spiritual Gentrification

Rate: 4 Flag


bv1
THE BELIEVERS


Released: June 1987
Director: John Schlesinger
Writers: Mark Frost (screenplay), Nicholas Conde (novel)
Notable Cast: Martin Sheen, Helen Shaver, Harley Cross, Jimmy Smits, Robert Loggia, Malick Bowens
Plot: A New York psychiatrist finds that a voodoo cult, which believes in child sacrifice, has a keen interest in his own son. (source: imdb) 
Commentary:  I hadn't seen this one since it came out on VHS in 1988 or so.  I remember it was a time when "voodoo" ruled the motifs of several popular horror movies - Angel Heart, The Serpent and the Rainbow, and The Believers - and so I became obsessed with the topic.
Seeing it again with fresh eyes, I both appreciated it right down to its problematic themes.  And it inspired some thinking, and possibly some topics for a future blog.
What did I like?  Martin Sheen and several others did their job right.  It was well paced and it worked as a thriller.  For the 1980's New York afficionados, it's a fun treat.  The supernatural aspects were for the most part handled appropriately aside from a few tacky horror movie gross-outs.
The plot summary neglects to mention a few things. It not only involves a suspected cult in the Latino neighborhoods of New York City, it  also involves a Donald Trump-ish mogul with political ambitions (but played with much more restraint and class than Trump himself possesses), and a coterie of New Yorkers in the upper eschelons of society.  Finally,  although the central current throughout the film involves an Afro-Caribbean cult, it's not Voodoo or Vodun.  It's Santeria.
And there's a layer beyond that. But I'll get to that when we talk about what we're afraid of.
Apologies if I get didactic and PC.  The Believers is presented very seriously,  not as a cheesy teen gore-fest, so to simply just say "voodoo" and conflate it with a whole bunch of sinister goings on and  child sacrifice doesn't wash for me.  Santeria is a living religion, it syncretizes Christianity, and it has been misunderstood and maligned, especially in the Satanic Panic-happy 1980's.

Queen of Salsa Celia Cruz sings a paean to St. Barbara, the Catholic, female side of the orisha Chango
 What We're Afraid Of:  Grab some coffee, there's a lot going on in this film and I'm longwinded. There will also be strong SPOILERS in this section, in case you want to see the film.
In The Believers we have a trifecta of fears: economic anxiety, race and child abuse panic.
The last of these is simple to see.  Child sacrifice is  a central tenet of this evil fictional cult.  And above that, it's angelic white kids getting all served up.  Most horror movies of the 1980's are informed by the Satanic Panic, and to many of the weird circles that promoted the Satanic Ritual Abuse myth, Santeria v. Satanism isn't even up for debate.  It's all the same thing.
Which of course, isn't true.  And this movie pre-dates the incident in Matamoros, Mexico (and that's a horror movie waiting to be made), which involved Palo Mayombe .   And though these murders were conducted by sociopaths, Palo Mayombe itself isn't any sort of child sacrifice religion.
It should be noted that The Believers actually does attempt to make a distinction.  Santeria was a red herring for a more sinister magical practice.  A Puerto Rican Santero was consulted, and ultimately, the narrative exonerates the religion from any black magic.  That is, if you pay attention and don't think that all regions of Africa are interchangeable.
 Now on to economic anxiety, which is also directly tied to the race question.  Here we see a cult masterminded by, as I said, a Donald Trump type with political ambitions.  Child sacrifice, even the children of the cultists themselves, equals economic prosperity and a curious placidity and lack of guilt in these rich, powerful Manhattan yuppies.  It's Gordon Gecko slumming it in the Bronx in order to make it big.
Has anyone checked Ivan Boesky's basement?
That brings us to race in the film.  The evil cult uses some Santeria and Yoruba-derived trappings, but as the plot of the film explains, it all began when two white American academics, husband and wife, were doing fieldwork in The Sudan.  When their son was dying, they attended a local ceremony wherein the son was allowed to die in exchange for the life of a child in the tribe. This magical transaction gave them both power and financial security.
That child from the Sudanese tribe - named "Palo", yep -  was adopted and became a living power conduit for the cult, perhaps better known in Western occult lore as a "familiar."  The cult of rich whites venerates him and look upon him as very holy, and really do value the peace of mind he brings them.  All the malignant hexes are performed by him.
So, in a move that ties both race and economic anxiety, the Caribbean Latino religion Santeria is "gentrified" by greedy whites wanting to move up the economic chain. 
In the twist at the end, even Sheen's love interest played by Helen Shaver, adopts Santeria after a gross and harrowing encounter with Palo's magic.  While it's supposed to be a spooky shock ending that makes you question her, I don't blame her one bit.  She's felt what this magic can do to her first hand, so why not turn to it for protection?
Furthermore, the academics who founded the cult took this black child from The Sudan and employed his power for their material and psychological gain. 
Spiritual colonialism, if not quite slavery.
I tried doing some research on Sudanese paganism and whether or not it was related to West African Yoruba or Fon religions, and whether or not it involved human sacrifice. 
My research was inconclusive, especially to the latter point.  There's a huge wave of Satanic Panic in several African countries under which a lot of people and children suffer, and it appears that may include Sudan.  It would take more time than I have to dig for truth.
And I'm suspicious of a movie that claims to be about Santeria but whose central magic user comes from the Sudan, which doesn't really have any ties to Santeria from what I can see.  I suppose Palo could have studied all kinds of African magic to supplement his tradition - who knows.  My guess would be the filmmakers didn't think it through and counted on the audience to just think "voodoo."
Palo is played by actor Malick Bowens, who appears to be quite talented based on his imdb history.  And here he's given no lines.  He's simply an insane-eyed boogeyman, stalking and hexing Sheen's character and those close to him, and just being all around scary.  Intentionally or not, it plays to stereotypes of urban black men and "primitive" wild-eyed voodoo crimelords like Yaphet Kotto in Live and Let Die.
  bv2
The Believers
  bv3
The Serpent and the Rainbow
bv4
Live and Let Die 

Check these reviews from blogger Paghat the Ratgirl and from no less than Roger Ebert, who notes:
Every voodoo movie ever made has depicted bloodthirsty cults of savagely sadistic murderers, vengefully thirsting for innocent blood. There has been a lot in the papers recently about "Arab-bashing," the practice of creating strongly negative stereotypes of Arabs on TV and in the movies. I'm in agreement. But what about voodoo-bashing? Isn't it just as prejudicial?

Here endeth the analysis, and thinking all of this through makes me appreciate this film more, flaws and all. I'll be blogging more on this subject.


 

 Chillerpop takes all questions and comments via Twitter (@Chillerpop) or via Facebook
Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!

Comments

R&R And I followed the link to El Padrino de Matamoros. You're right! There's a real horror story there. :-)
Thanks much jmac! I fell behind yesterday and today, but hopefully can remain on-schedule.
This is hilarious: “Has anyone checked Ivan Boesky's basement?” I liked this film, possibly because it stars Martin Sheen who, for some unaccountable reason, I find absolutely compelling to watch—that upper lip thing he does is marvelous, but mostly I think he conveys the beset, beleaguered “everyman” archetype so well. Your analysis is so sharp it could strip the bark from a tree. It articulated what for me was a vague apprehension of the film’s thematic currents. Isn’t it interesting how often economic insecurity comes up in these films. Says something about the American mind, what it considers the truly horrible to be, doesn’t it?
Jerry - Yes indeed. This is the first time I've ever really noticed it, apart from the movie "Drag Me to Hell". And I also enjoy Martin Sheen's performances, certainly more than his tiger-blooded warlock bro Charlie.
Very interesting analysis. I haven't seen this movie but it has a lot of great people in it: director, writers and cast.
I saw this movie when I was working in Europe in the late 80s-early 90s. It was on one of the hotel in-house movie channels and I thought it was great and creepy in a B-movie-ish way. Thanks for the reminder. I'm also a big Martin Sheen fan. Wouldn't mind seeing it again now that you mention it as I didn't pick up on the incongruity of the Sudan connection.
Abra - some of the movies that just stay with you for whatever reason come from such trips! Thanks for commenting.
OCTOBER 28, 2014 1:29PM

Oh Sweet Jesus

Rate: 10 Flag
  LB1
LEFT BEHIND - THE MOVIE

Released: 2000 (on video before a theatrical run)
Director: Vic Sarin
Writers: Alan B. McElroy, Paul Lalonde, Joe Goodman, Tim LaHaye, Jerry B. Jenkins
Notable Cast: Kirk Cameron, Brad Johnson, Janaya Stephens, Chelsea Noble
Plot: Left Behind is the story of Buck Williams and Rayford Steele, two gay porn stars righteous Christian heroes  who turn from sin and see the light after all the people who are true Christians are Raptured right on up to heaven.
Because those people are better than you, and you deserve to suffer through years of strife and misery. 
Meanwhile lots of chaotic things happen and we learn the evil plot of Nicolae Carpathia.  And if you're smart you KNOW he's the evil Antichrist because  Carpathia implies spooooky, and that's much more subtle than naming him Dracula McSatanpants. 
Nicky Ural Mountains - err, Carpathia also happens to be the UN Secretary General.  Because duh! Everyone knows the UN is a godless liberal front for the AntiChrist, and they're coming to take your guns, your right to pray and your right to say the Pledge of Allegiance before commencing a government sponsored bake sale.
So Christian studs Buck and Rayford are all organizing an underground of righteous believing Christians who are gonna get right with God and stick their boot up  the AntiChrist's ass.  Or something.
Commentary: My name is ChillerPop and I'm addicted to Dominionist porn.  That's right. 
That sheer adrenaline rush of incredulous WTF, anger and wrong entertainment that I get when I read or watch narratives about the End Times from our nation's evangelical right wing - it's intoxicating.
And so, with Nicholas Cage starring in a 2014 remake of Left Behind, which I'm very excited to see,  I had to revisit the psychotronic 2000 version starring Kirk "Intelligent design's bananas, yo!" Cameron. 
Left Behind is really the lucrative invention of Jerry B.  Jenkins and Tim LaHaye, both members of said evangelical, Dispensationalist right wing.  And the books and this film is a whole bunch of  silly gratification for that bunch. 
There's a lot of that Israel fetishism that Dominionists harbor.  You can witness a lecture from Cameron's character Buck Williams about lying and the evils of moral relativism, after which he tells a lie in order to infiltrate the AntiChrist's lair of evil, because it's okay if you lie to the AntiChrist.  There's hand-wringing adultery guilt, and a sexy adulteress played by Cameron's wife.
There's atheists and secularists who just love Nicolae Carpathia, because duh!  And of course, there's Christian persecution. Tons of it.
Nothing much else to say about this movie.  All I can do really is point you to the excellent book Revelations: Visions, Prophecy, and Politics in the Book of Revelation by Elaine Pagels, wherein you can read her solid argument that since its inception, the Book of Revelations is a lot of dense symbolism and imagery that helps people define and categorize a political "other" in religious terms.
 Otherwise, like I said, this movie, these stories are Dominionist, Dispensationalist Christian Reconstructionist fap material.  Also for insane bloggers who enjoy theological and political schaudenfraude.  I'll stick to my habit and write about it so that you don't have to.

What We're Afraid Of: "We" are afraid of: religious freedom, freedom from religion, tolerance of non Judeo Christian ideas, atheists, non-Christian faiths, secularism, communism, socialism, anarchism, international co-operation, the occult, world governments, liberalism, feminism, women with control of their sexuality and reproduction, sinners, the gays, and much much more.
"We" are not afraid of: The Devil.  In fact, "we" luuuuv the Devil because after all, you don't get Raptured if the Devil don't make his move, so "we" kinda sorta need him, and plus, "we" told you so! "We" told you he was real and he's gonna getcha! 
"We" also aren't afraid of Israel or Jews that aren't for Jesus, because "we" also need them in order for Revelations to pass.  And once the Rapture happens, "we" won't have to worry about them ever again.
What I'm Afraid Of:
NOT faithful Christians, or even literal believers in the Rapture who nonetheless are kind, don't seek to limit others' rights through legislation or misinformation, and understand that belief and faith are a private and personal matter, and get on with life in a positive manner. 
Here are the things related to Left Behind-The Movie that I am afraid of:

lb2
LB3
lb4
  lb5

"Jews to the left, please.  Jews for Jesus to my right.  Thank you."  Snarky comment, mine.  Excerpt from Glorious Appearing by Jerry B. Jenkins and Tim LaHaye follows:
"When you see My throne, join those on My right, your left."
The words of Jesus were more than impressed on Rayford's heart. He had actually heard them. He moved to his left without question, and as waves of people moved both directions, suddenly the view before Rayford became clear. Directly below and centered under the vast heavenly hosts, saints, and angels, a great platform bore a throne on which Jesus sat. Behind Him stood the three angels of mercy. On either side of Him stood the archangels Michael and Gabriel.
Rayford knew instinctively that every living person on earth was gathered in that valley.
Chaim explained: "Half a billion or more were raptured seven years ago. Half the remaining population was killed during the Seal and Trumpet Judgments during the next three and a half years. Many more were lost during the Vial Judgments, and millions of believers were martyred. What you are looking at is probably only one-fourth of those who were left after the Rapture. And most of these will die today."
Indeed, Rayford realized, those assembling on Jesus' right were scant compared to those on His left.
It took most of the morning for the masses to find their places and settle. To Rayford it appeared that those to Jesus' left were puzzled at best, frightened at worst.
Gabriel stepped to the front of the platform and stretched out his arms for silence. "Worship the King of kings and Lord of lords!" he shouted, and as one the millions on both sides of the throne fell to their knees. In a cacophony of languages and dialects they cried out, "Jesus Christ is Lord!"
Those on the left of Jesus began rising to their feet, while all around Rayford, everyone remained kneeling. "Clearly two different groups here, eh, Chaim?"
"Actually three," the old man said. "Those are the 'goats' over there, the followers of Antichrist who somehow survived to this point. You are among the 'sheep' on this side, but I represent the third group. I am part of Jesus' 'brethren,' the chosen people of God whom the sheep befriended. We are the Jews who will go into the Millennium as believers, because of people like you."
Gabriel was gesturing that all should stand. When everyone was in place and quiet, he spoke in a loud voice:
"John the revelator wrote: 'I saw an altar, and underneath it all the souls of those who had been martyred for preaching the Word of God and for being faithful in their witnessing.
"'They called loudly to the Lord and said, "O Sovereign Lord, holy and true, how long will it be before You judge the people of the earth for what they've done to us? When will You avenge our blood against those living on the earth?"
....
The group to Jesus' left immediately fell to their knees again and began shouting and wailing, "Jesus Christ is Lord! Jesus Christ is Lord!"
Jesus stood and walked to the edge of the platform.
With anger and yet sadness, He said, "Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels: for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me."
The millions began shouting and pleading, "Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?"
Jesus said, "Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me. You will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life."
"No! No! No!"
But despite their numbers and the dissonance of their bawling, Jesus could be heard above them. "As the Father raises the dead and gives life to them, even so the Son gives life to whom He will. For the Father judges no one, but has committed all judgment to the Son, that all should honor the Son just as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him."
"We honor You! We do! You are Lord!"
"Most assuredly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has everlasting life, and shall not come into judgment, but has passed from death into life.
"But My Father has given Me authority to execute judgment also, because I am the Son of Man. I can of Myself do nothing. As I hear, I judge; and My judgment is righteous, because I do not seek My own will but the will of the Father who sent Me."
"Jesus is Lord!" the condemned shouted. "Jesus is Lord!"
Gabriel stepped forward as Jesus returned to the throne. "Silence!" Gabriel commanded. "Your time has come!"
Rayford watched, horrified despite knowing this was coming, as the "goats" to Jesus' left beat their breasts and fell wailing to the desert floor, gnashing their teeth and pulling their hair. Jesus merely raised one hand a few inches and a yawning chasm opened in the earth, stretching far and wide enough to swallow all of them. They tumbled in, howling and screeching, but their wailing was soon quashed and all was silent when the earth closed itself again.
Everyone on the platform moved back into place, and from the throne Jesus said, "Surely, as I have thought, so it shall come to pass, and as I have purposed, so it shall stand."
Cool!  Jesus can totally wipe out his enemies with his rad superpowers!  That also  includes the entire UN Peace Keeping Force armies of the AntiChrist.  He can turn a battlefield into a torture porn movie with the power of his voice, which makes him way cooler than Jigsaw or Freddy Krueger:
“And with those very first words, tens of thousands of Unity Army soldiers fell dead, simply dropping where they stood, their bodies ripped open, blood pooling in great masses.”

“With every word, more and more enemies of God dropped dead, torn to pieces.”

“Rayford watched through binocs as men and women soldiers and horses seemed to explode where they stood. It was as if the very words of the Lord had superheated their blood, causing it to burst through their veins and skin.”
“…and writhed as they were invisibly sliced asunder. Their innards and entrails gushed to the desert floor… their blood pooling and rising in the unforgiving brightness of the glory of Christ.”
That right there would be the Holiest horror movie ever made since The Jesus Chainsaw Massacre The Passion of the Christ.



 Chillerpop takes all questions and comments via Twitter (@Chillerpop) or via Facebook
Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!

Comments

Rated, not least because of the Elaine Pagels reference. Your description of the plot and your commentary are a hoot. I’ve often thought that if someone asked me if anything exists that is completely devoid of nuance, that is automatically, on its first appearance, of diminishing marginal utility, that is as self-placid as a cud-chewing ruminant, this movie would be it.
Thanks Jerry - great observation indeed. And copyright "self-placid as a cud-chewing ruminant" before I steal it!

Thanks to you too Jonathan.
RW, is that the group that the book "The Family" by Jeff Sharlet? I can only imagine what must have come from that seminar.
Wow. This sounds like one of those life-changing movies. I know, I've seen dozens of them. But it sounds like this one will come as a...revelation.
Oh, it's a revelation alright, Dandy.
Moving to Atlanta in 2000, I was horrified at how many moms who picked up their children from preschool had that book under their arm. It really makes my blood run cold.
Interestingly, that excerpt above reminded me a little of the Old Testament with the condemning, fire and brimstone god who commanded the slaughter of the Canaanites/pagans in the 'promised land.'

In my work, I mostly research with a mesolithic to bronze age focus, centering in central to eastern Europe's 'Old Europe' culture, a goddess-oriented culture that radiated out from...
the Carpathian Mtns.
Interesting.
Ol' Nicholae Carpathia, eh?
Nicholae is also a common name in Romania...over there in the Carpathians.

There are so many gorgeous and varied Neolithic goddess figurines there unearthed in that region.
Goddess worshipping peoples, a fascinating historical, and too little-known, *dominant culture* for eons.
....and that's not even talking about much further back, into the thousands of paleolithic goddess figurines unearthed all over Europe...


As someone who grew up in a very liberal Christian household, every single bit of the 'Fundies' ways are offensive and nothing like the teachings I grew up with.
As an old southern granny once said to me, "Any kinda' Christian teaching or believing in Fear, has already lost their way to the Light."
Also, growing up in 70s Atlanta, most people heard/knew the extreme, evangelical churches were telling all their congregants to literally multiply all over the place in order to birth a large force for the Fundies in the next generation.
And here we are today.
The building of the current Fundy power base was carefully planned, beginning with 'be fruitful and multiply' sermons - literally - and on to homeschooling and churches so large, they have their own ballet classes, gym classes, anything a Fundy family might want without *any* influence from the Seculars. or the moderate or liberal Christians, much less non-believers - all available in their churches, and all planned out for political power gain, years and years ago.
s/b:
'...for *future* political power gain.'
JustThinking - undoubtedly, the great deal of Christians who don't hold to this very limited, very horrid interpretation of the Bible and who express the positive aspects of their faith must never be considered any part of this group. Regarding your work - how incredibly awesome! I'm a would be archaeologist myself, so I can imagine how fascinating your research must be. I'd love to hear more.
I thought that only 144,000 were getting Raptured... R&R ;-)
Your reviews are much more entertaining than the movies. Great style.
You know, Sarah Palin was a Dominionist, according to reports. Scary!

/r.
Dracula McSatanpants. Love that!

Very entertaining.
I pretty much wept with laughter at "Dracula McSatanpants." And now I know what Dominionist porn is.
I'd rather see the Gay Porn Stars version of this. :D
VA, you ain't seen nothin' yet of Dominionist porn. Check out Tink's comment.

"BUCK Williams and Rayford STEELE....in..... RIGHT BEHIND!"
Oh sweet jesus indeed.